Presencia de buenas prácticas de humanización en la atención a los pacientes con enfermedades raras en los servicios de farmacia / Presence of good humanization practices in the healthcare of patients with rare diseases in Pharmacy Services

Objetivo analizar la presencia de buenas prácticas de humanización en la atención a los pacientes con enfermedades raras en los servicios de farmacia hospitalaria para identificar las fortalezas y las áreas prevalentes de mejora para una atención más humanizada. Métodos se elaboró un cuestionario online empleando Google Form® estructurado en 2 partes: la primera recogía datos identificativos y la segunda incluía las preguntas relacionadas con el cumplimiento de los 61 estándares del Manual de buenas prácticas de humanización en la atención a pacientes con enfermedades raras en los servicios de farmacia hospitalaria. El acceso al cuestionario se envió por correo electrónico a los jefes de servicio de farmacia hospitalaria de 18 hospitales. El periodo de estudio fue de octubre 2021 a octubre 2022. Las variables analizadas fueron el número de criterios cumplidos, el cumplimiento total (porcentaje de criterios cumplidos) tanto por línea estratégica como por tipo o nivel de estándar (básico, básico de obligado cumplimiento, avanzado o excelente), de forma global y agrupados por comunidades autónomas. Resultados el estudio incluyó 18 servicios de farmacia hospitalaria. La media global de estándares cumplidos fue de 31,1 (IC 95%: 24,8–37,6) y el cumplimiento total medio del 52,1% (IC 95%: 44,4–59,7). La línea 1, Cultura de humanización, tuvo un cumplimiento medio del 46,5% (IC 95%: 35,3–57,7), la línea 2, Empoderamiento del paciente, del 47,4% (IC 95%: 37,1–57,8), la línea 3, Cuidado del profesional, del 49,7% (IC 95%: 39,8–59,1), la línea 4, Espacios físicos y confort del 55,6% (IC 95%: 46,3–64,8) y la línea 5, Organización de la atención, del 63,8% (IC 95%: 55,8–71,9). Conclusión el cumplimiento medio de los estándares está entre 40 y 60%, lo que indica que la humanización está presente en los servicios de farmacia hospitalaria, pero existe un amplio margen de mejora (AU)

Objective To analyze the presence of Good Humanization Practices in the care of patients with rare diseases in Hospital Pharmacy Services and to identify the strengths and prevalent areas for improvement in the humanization of healthcare. Methods Online questionnaire structured in two parts was developed using Google Form®. The first one was designed to collect identifying data and the second one included questions related to compliance with the 61 standards of the Manual of Good Humanization Practices in the healthcare of patients with rare diseases in Hospital Pharmacy Services. Access to the questionnaire was sent by email to the Heads of the Hospital Pharmacy Service of 18 hospitals. The study period was from October 2021 to October 2022. The analyzed variables were the number of criteria that were considered met, total compliance (percentage of criteria met), by strategic line and by type or level of standard, globally and grouped by regions of Spain. Results 18 Hospital Pharmacy Services were included. The overall mean of standards met was 31.1 (95% CI: 24.8–37.6) and mean total compliance was 52.1% (95% CI: 44.4–59.7). The mean compliance by strategic line was line 1 Humanization culture: 46.5% (95% CI: 35.3–57.7), line 2 Patient empowerment: 47.4% (95% CI: 37.1– 57.8), line 3 Professional care: 49.7% (95% CI: 39.8–59.1), line 4 Physical spaces and comfort: 55.6% (95% CI: 46.3–64.8) and line 5 Organization of healthcare: 63.8% (95% CI: 55.8–71.9). Conclusion The average compliance with the standards is between 40 and 60%, which indicates that humanization is present in the Hospital Pharmacy Services, but there is a wide margin for improvement. The main strength in the humanization of Hospital Pharmacy Services is a patient-centered care organization, and the area with the greatest room for improvement is the culture of humanization (AU)

Presence of good humanization practices in the healthcare of patients with rare diseases in Pharmacy Services. / Presencia de buenas prácticas de humanización en la atención a los pacientes con enfermedades raras en los servicios de farmacia.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the presence of Good Humanization Practices in the care of patients with rare diseases in Hospital Pharmacy Services and to identify the strengths and prevalent areas for improvement in the humanization of healthcare. METHODS: Online questionnaire structured in two parts was developed using Google Form®. The first one was designed to collect identifying data and the second one included questions related to compliance with the 61 standards of the Manual of Good Humanization Practices in the healthcare of patients with rare diseases in Hospital Pharmacy Services. Access to the questionnaire was sent by email to the Heads of the Hospital Pharmacy Service of 18 hospitals. The study period was from October 2021 to October 2022. The analyzed variables were the number of criteria that were considered met, total compliance (percentage of criteria met), by strategic line and by type or level of standard, globally and grouped by regions of Spain. RESULTS: 18 Hospital Pharmacy Services were included. The overall mean of standards met was 31.1 (95% CI: 24.8-37.6) and mean total compliance was 52.1% (95% CI: 44.4-59.7). The mean compliance by strategic line was line 1 Humanization culture: 46.5% (95% CI: 35.3-57.7), line 2 Patient empowerment: 47.4% (95% CI: 37.1- 57.8), line 3 Professional care: 49.7% (95% CI: 39.8-59.1), line 4 Physical spaces and comfort: 55.6% (95% CI: 46.3-64.8) and line 5 Organization of healthcare: 63.8% (95% CI: 55.8-71.9). CONCLUSION: The average compliance with the standards is between 40 and 60%, which indicates that humanization is present in the Hospital Pharmacy Services, but there is a wide margin for improvement. The main strength in the humanization of Hospital Pharmacy Services is a patient-centered care organization, and the area with the greatest room for improvement is the culture of humanization.

[Translated article] Good humanisation practices in the healthcare of patients with rare diseases in Pharmacy Services.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the presence of Good Humanisation Practices in the care of patients with rare diseases in Hospital Pharmacy Services and to identify the strengths and prevalent areas for improvement in the humanisation of healthcare. METHODS: An online questionnaire structured in 2 parts was developed using Google Form®. The first one was designed to collect identifying data and the second one included questions related to compliance with the 61 standards of the Manual of Good Humanisation Practices in the healthcare of patients with rare diseases in Hospital Pharmacy Services. Access to the questionnaire was sent by email to the Heads of the Hospital Pharmacy Service of 18 hospitals. The study period was from October 2021 to October 2022. The analysed variables were the number of criteria that were considered met, total compliance (percentage of criteria met), by strategic line and by type or level of standard, globally and grouped by regions of Spain. RESULTS: 18 Hospital Pharmacy Services were included. The overall mean of standards met was 31.1 (95% CI: 24.8-37.6) and mean total compliance was 52.1% (95% CI: 44.4%-59.7%). The mean compliance by strategic line was: Line 1, Humanisation culture: 46.5% (95% CI: 35.3%-57.7%), Line 2, Patient empowerment: 47.4% (95% CI: 37.1%-57.8%), Line 3, Professional care: 49.7% (95% CI: 39.8%-59.1%), Line 4, Physical spaces and comfort: 55.6% (95% CI: 46.3%-64.8%), and Line 5, Organisation of healthcare: 63.8% (95% CI: 55.8%-71.9%). CONCLUSION: The average compliance with the standards is between 40% and 60%, which indicates that humanisation is present in the Hospital Pharmacy Services, but there is a wide margin for improvement. The main strength in the humanisation of Hospital Pharmacy Services is a patient-centred care organisation, and the area with the greatest room for improvement is the culture of humanisation.

Intraperitoneal vancomycin in neonates during peritoneal dialysis: A case report.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Guidelines for prevention and treatment of peritonitis in paediatric patients recommend vancomycin. We present the clinical practice in neonates during peritoneal dialysis and evaluate dosage and serum levels of vancomycin. CASE SUMMARY: This case report describes a newborn with acute renal failure under continuous peritoneal dialysis therapy and intraperitoneal vancomycin. We report the treatment dosage and serum vancomycin levels. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: There is great variability in the recommended dose of vancomycin for continuous peritoneal dialysis and the available clinical experience. Further investigation of dosing in children particularly in newborns, especially in loading dose, is necessary.

Early experience with compassionate use of 2 hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin for Niemann-Pick type C disease: review of initial published cases.

Niemann-Pick type C (NP-C) is a rare neurodegenerative disorder. Management is mainly supportive and symptomatic. The investigational use of 2-hydroxypropyl-ß-cyclodextrin (HP-ß-CD) showed a promising role in treating NP-C, although efficacy and safety have not been established. We conducted searches of MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, and other databases of reported cases of HP-ß-CD compassionate use in NP-C disease. Sixteen reported cases were eligible, including evaluable information of 17 patients. The median onset age of HP-ß-CD was 14 years (range 2-49 years). Intrathecal route was employed in 16 patients, in 3 patients simultaneously to IV infusions. Intracerebroventricular route was used in two patients. An objective improvement of clinical outcomes was measured in 14 patients, mainly by the NIH NP-C Clinical Severity Score and brainstem auditory evoked potential. Besides, an increase in metabolism and activities of the brain were observed in image tests and cholesterol biomarkers. Most patients showed some clinical benefit or a stabilization of NP-C progression. There were 17 adverse events (AEs) reported in 11 patients, 11 of them related to the drug and 6 to the route of administration. Loss of hearing was reported in four patients. The most severe AE were fever and chemical meningitis. Results suggest that efficacy may be partial and dependent on the early administration of the drug, the severity of the disease, and interpersonal variability. HP-ß-CD could help stabilize NP-C with low toxicity potential, although some AEs have been reported. Moreover, controlled clinical trials would be necessary to evaluate the role of HP-ß-CD in NP-C.